top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe San Juan Daily Star

Balloon incident highlights fragile state of US-China relationship

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, right, in July with China’s foreign minister at the time, Wang Yi, in Bali, Indonesia.


After years of deepening mistrust and simmering tensions, ties between the United States and China appeared poised for a modest rebound after the meeting of the two nations’ leaders at a summit last November and recent efforts by Beijing to stabilize its relations with the world. A visit by Secretary of State Antony Blinken to Beijing this weekend was expected to build on that progress.

All it took was a balloon to upend everything.

The discovery of what U.S. military officials called a “high-altitude surveillance balloon” over Montana last week, and Blinken’s decision Friday to cancel his trip, has again exposed the fragility of a relationship between two powers locked in an increasingly tense rivalry for military, geopolitical and technological dominance.

The revelation of the balloon, which the U.S. shot down Saturday, fueled bipartisan outrage in the United States and gave the Biden administration little room to maneuver — even as China uncharacteristically expressed regret for the vessel’s appearance.

The two countries issued competing claims about the nature of the airship. The Pentagon said it was used for “intelligence-gathering,” whereas China said it was a civilian vessel used for scientific research and that it had strayed off course.

Wang Yi, the top official in China’s foreign policy hierarchy, told Blinken in a phone call late Friday that “China is a responsible country and has always strictly abided by international law,” the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on its website.

The brief summary of their call did not mention the balloon or Blinken’s cancellation of his trip, but suggested China’s leaders believed the Biden administration had blown the episode out of proportion.

While there was no indication the balloon posed a serious military or intelligence threat to the United States, the symbolism of a Chinese craft drifting over the continental United States added a new element of volatility to a relationship that is at the core of the world’s most pressing challenges — including maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait, rebuilding post-pandemic economies and combating climate change.

“It’s a little action with a big consequence,” Rorry Daniels, managing director of the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York, said of the balloon. “It’s kind of mind blowing when you look at the history of U.S.-China relations and all the different phases the relationship has been through to end up here.”

Shrinking levels of contact between the two governments in recent years have made it more difficult for them to test assumptions about each other’s intentions during diplomatic crises, she added.

In the months before the balloon episode, China’s diplomatic corps had toned down its typically acerbic rhetoric about Washington. One highlight was an appeal from the incoming Chinese foreign minister, Qin Gang, to build “mutual understanding and affinity between the two peoples” in remarks he made last month upon leaving his post as ambassador to the United States.

China has been looking to reduce tensions overseas to focus its energy on repairing its beleaguered economy and transition out of COVID-induced isolation. Liu He, the country’s vice premier, last month attended the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, to woo foreign investment and declare that China was open for business again.

How an apparent Chinese spy balloon ended up over the United States amid such a backdrop hints at divisions within the Chinese government about its strategy toward its chief geopolitical competitor, analysts say.

“The overall direction of China’s recent diplomatic messaging to the United States has been to seek to lower tensions,” said Ryan Hass, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former National Security Council director for China.

“The spy balloon incident is discordant with the overall messaging,” he added. “This raises questions about the quality of coordination within China’s security system.”

Hass said China’s leader, Xi Jinping, can ill afford to let Sino-U.S. relations sour even further. Managing these ties is among Xi’s chief responsibilities in the eyes of the country’s elite.

Under his watch, Washington has crippled major Chinese telecommunications companies like Huawei, imposed sweeping export bans on critical semiconductor technology and fortified military relationships across Asia, most recently with news this past week about the expansion of U.S. access to military bases in the Philippines.

“Secretary Blinken’s very visible postponement of his visit could generate questions internally about Xi’s capacity to manage tensions with the United States,” Hass said. “This issue already has been a soft spot in Xi’s overall résumé after a decade of historically strained relations with the United States under his leadership.”

Tensions could escalate this year. There is already a new select committee in the House of Representatives to investigate the strategic challenges posed by China. And if the new speaker, Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., makes good on plans to visit Taiwan, that could stoke the same tensions that prompted China to respond with a near military blockade when the former speaker, Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., traveled to the self-governing island last year.

China’s response on Friday to the balloon revelation underscored the country’s more measured tone since last year. The confrontational tack of the past — known as “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy, so named after a jingoistic Chinese film — would not have expressed anything close to regret for the balloon. Instead, Beijing’s admission that the vessel was Chinese, and its pledge to continue communicating with the United States, suggests a desire to press ahead with Blinken’s visit.

“It is worthy of recognition that China acknowledged the balloon,” said Shen Dingli, a Shanghai-based international relations scholar who focuses on U.S.-China ties.

36 views1 comment

1 commentaire

Rose Rose
Rose Rose
06 févr. 2023

I’m not worried about a balloon probably contracted by a European lineaged idiot who signed a contract with China. I’m more concerned about the European nations continued usage of American shell companies to destroy other nations like Boriken. we have all the European traitors managing Puerto Rico’s energy source. While these idiots in the government signed contracts with Venezuelan oil (keep in mind Boriken has it’s own oil) and Costa Rican plantains (keep in mind Boriken has it’s own plantains). you have morons at the helm of the pr government, complete morons, so embarrassing to witness so many traitors destroy nations. The worst part is that they dress up as other lineages faking who they are, which is horrendous.

bottom of page