top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe San Juan Daily Star

Biden administration plans for new booster campaign soon after Labor Day

Assuming the redesigned doses clear regulatory hurdles, officials plan to offer the Pfizer shot to people 12 and older while limiting the Moderna shot to adults.

By Sharon LaFraniere and Noah Weiland

The Biden administration plans to offer the next generation of coronavirus booster shots to Americans 12 and older soon after Labor Day, a campaign that federal officials hope will reduce deaths from COVID-19 and protect against an expected winter surge.

Dr. Peter Marks, the top vaccine regulator for the Food and Drug Administration, said earlier this week that while he could not discuss timing, his team was close to authorizing updated doses that would target the versions of the virus now circulating.

Even though those formulations have not been tested in humans, he said, the agency has “extremely good” data showing that the shots are safe and will be effective. “How confident am I?” he said. “I’m extremely confident.”

This week, both Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech finalized their submissions to the FDA asking for emergency authorization of booster shots aimed at BA.5 and another subvariant of omicron that together account for most coronavirus cases in the United States.

Federal health officials say they are eager to offer the updated boosters as quickly as possible, pointing to a death toll that now averages about 450 Americans per day and could rise in the coming months as people spend more time indoors.

“We have really got to do better to protect the American public,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, said Tuesday. “We are in the middle of a BA.5 outbreak here, and we are nowhere near where we want to be.”

The Biden administration has struggled to convince Americans of the need for successive vaccinations. Only about two-thirds of the population has been inoculated with the primary series of two shots, and far fewer have received booster doses.

Some outside scientists have said the government is moving too fast to clear redesigned shots, saying that the existing vaccines provide strong protection against severe disease.

“Deaths are concentrated in unvaccinated people and people with serious health conditions,” said John Moore, a virus expert at Weill Cornell Medicine. He said the extra protection that the new shots would provide against infection could be “weak to nonexistent.”

Jeremy Kamil, a virus expert at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, said that although he supported new boosters, many people had immunity from recent infections. “Even if we get this out in the next 10 days, how many people are left who haven’t gotten omicron?” he said.

Other scientists said that the government’s plan made sense given how the virus has changed and the evidence that immunity wanes over time. Marks said if regulators waited for additional data or recommendations from outside experts, the virus might evolve further and “we may have lost a bunch of individuals who could otherwise be sitting around at the dinner table together.”

In a sign of impending action from the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has scheduled a two-day meeting of its advisory panel of experts on the matter for Sept. 1 and 2. The CDC director, Rochelle Walensky, would then make a final decision on whether to roll out the new doses. Shipments to states could begin as early as next week, according to officials familiar with the plan.

The government plans to offer the new Pfizer booster to everyone 12 and older while limiting the new Moderna shot to adults. People who have already received the initial two-shot series of either vaccine would be eligible. So would those who have received the initial shots plus one or two booster shots. The new booster campaign could be broadened to younger children later.

Marks suggested that the biggest obstacle to the effort was the level of complacency that had set in, even as the pandemic continued to exact what he called an “unacceptable” death toll.

He said the FDA might recommend that people who had recently received a COVID-19 vaccine dose wait “a few months” before getting the new shot, even if they were otherwise eligible. He said the CDC might weigh in on whether people who were recently infected with the virus should also wait.

As of mid-August, the federal government had bought more than 170 million doses of the updated version of the vaccines. This month, the CDC laid out detailed plans to offer the shots, warning that the supply would be “sufficient but finite” and saying that doses should be “directed to providers with expected demand among eligible patients.”

The new shots combine the original vaccine with components aimed at the BA.4 and BA.5, omicron’s recent subvariants. Officials argue that the new formulations will deliver a stronger boost to the immune system than the existing vaccines provide.

Unlike earlier shots, the redesigned formulations have not been tested widely on humans; instead, the companies have submitted data from mice trials. Some vaccine experts have complained that animal data is too preliminary and say regulators should wait for results of human clinical trials.

But Fauci said using animal data was “not anything different than we always do” in updating the flu vaccine each year. Marks said other evidence included the extensive track record with the existing vaccines and a series of earlier human trials with variant-specific formulations.

“I take great issue with those who say, ‘Oh, you’re just approving this with mouse data,’” he said. “We’re authorizing this with the totality of the evidence that we have.”

Moderna and Pfizer have both submitted clinical data from human studies of redesigned shots targeting the original version of the omicron variant. Britain last week authorized that version of Moderna’s vaccine, but U.S. regulators asked for formulations aimed at omicron’s newer subvariants.

The FDA will decide whether to authorize the retooled doses without seeking a recommendation from its outside advisory panel of experts, a step it usually takes before making new vaccines available. Critics have complained that regulators have bypassed the panel at crucial steps.

Marks defended the decision, saying a late June meeting of the advisory panel on the need to revise the vaccines had given regulators “everything we needed.” The committee voted overwhelmingly then in favor of updating the vaccines to work better against omicron or its subvariants, but it did not consider specific formulations.

24 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page