top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureThe San Juan Daily Star

In pursuit of consensus, did Biden find the reasonable middle or give away too much?


Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash), the chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, holds a press conference with other caucus members on Capitol Hill, Washington, on May 24, 2023. Many on the political left are aggravated that President Biden in their view gave in to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s hostage-taking strategy in debt-ceiling negotiations.

By Peter Baker


After weeks of tense wrangling between the White House and House Republicans, the fiscal deal reached on Saturday to raise the debt ceiling while constraining federal spending bolsters President Joe Biden’s argument that he is the one figure who can still do bipartisanship in a profoundly partisan era.


But it comes at the cost of rankling many in his own party who have little appetite for meeting Republicans in the middle and think the president cannot stop himself from giving away too much in an eternal and ephemeral quest for consensus. And it will now test his influence over fellow Democrats he will need to pass the deal in Congress.


The agreement in principle that he reached with Speaker Kevin McCarthy represents a case study in governing for Biden’s presidency, underscoring the fundamental tension of his leadership since the primaries in 2020 when he overcame progressive rivals to win the Democratic nomination. Biden believes in his bones in reaching across the aisle even at the expense of some of his own priorities.


He has shown that repeatedly since being inaugurated 2-1/2 years ago even as skeptics doubted that cross-party accommodation was still possible. Most notably, he pushed through Congress a bipartisan public works program directing $1 trillion to building or fixing roads, bridges, airports, broadband and other infrastructure; legislation expanding treatment for veterans exposed to toxic burn pits; and an investment program to boost the nation’s semiconductor industry, all of which passed with Republican votes.


This is not a moment, however, in which bipartisanship is valued in the way it was when Biden came up through the Senate in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. His desire to position himself as the leader who can bring together a deeply divided country is at the heart of his case for a second term next year. But it conflicts with the interests of many Democrats who see more political benefit in standing firm against former President Donald Trump’s Republican Party and prefer to draw a sharper contrast for their own elections in 2024 when they hope to recapture the House.


“The agreement also represents a compromise that means no one got everything they want, but that’s the responsibility of governing,” Biden told reporters at the White House Sunday evening.


Most importantly from Biden’s point of view, the agreement averts a catastrophic national default that could have cost many jobs, tanked the stock markets, jeopardized Social Security payments and sent the economy reeling. He is banking on the assumption that Americans will appreciate mature leadership that does not gamble with the nation’s economic health.


But many on the political left are aggravated that Biden in their view gave into McCarthy’s hostage-taking strategy. The president who said the debt ceiling was “not negotiable” ended up negotiating it after all to avoid a national default, barely even bothering with the fiction that talks over spending limits were somehow separate.


Liberals were pushing Biden to stiff the Republicans and short-circuit the debt ceiling altogether by claiming the power to ignore it under the 14th Amendment, which says the “validity of the public debt” of the federal government “shall not be questioned.” But while Biden agreed with the constitutional interpretation, he concluded it was too risky because the nation could still go into default while the issue was being litigated in the courts.


And so, much to the chagrin of his allies, the bargaining of recent weeks was entirely on Republican terms. While details were still emerging this weekend, the final agreement included no new Biden fiscal initiatives like higher taxes on the wealthy or expanded discounts for insulin. The question essentially was how much of the Limit, Save and Grow Act passed by House Republicans last month would the president accept in exchange for increasing the debt ceiling.


But Biden succeeded in stripping the Limit, Save and Grow Act significantly down from what it originally was, to the great consternation of conservative Republicans. Instead of raising the debt ceiling for less than one year while imposing hard caps on discretionary spending for 10 years, the agreement links the two so that the spending limits last just two years, the same as the debt ceiling increase. While Republicans insisted on predicating the limits on a baseline of 2022 spending levels, appropriations adjustments will make it effectively equivalent to the more favorable baseline of 2023.


As a result, the agreement will pare back anticipated spending over the decade just a fraction of what the Republicans sought. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the caps passed by House Republicans last month would have trimmed $3.2 trillion in discretionary spending over 10 years; a rough New York Times calculation suggests the agreement reached by Biden and McCarthy might instead cut one-third of that or less.


Moreover, while Biden did not advance many new Democratic policy goals in the agreement with McCarthy, he effectively shielded the bulk of his accomplishments from the first two years of his presidency from Republican efforts to gut them.


The challenge now for Biden is selling the compromise to his fellow Democrats. Just as McCarthy knows he will lose potentially dozens of Republicans disappointed in the accommodations he made, the president expects many in his own party to vote against the final product as well. But he needs to deliver enough Democrats to offset GOP defections to forge a bipartisan majority.


Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., summed up the reaction of many in his party. “None of the things in the bill are Democratic priorities,” he said on “Fox News Sunday,” citing health care, climate change and other issues and adding that “those are priorities and not a single one of them are in this bill.”


But he added that Biden had pared down the final product. “The reason it may have some traction with some Democrats is that it’s a very small bill.”


Sensitive to the criticism, the White House sent briefing materials and talking points to every House Democrat within minutes of striking the deal Saturday night and followed up Sunday with telephone calls. In his short meeting with reporters later in the day, Biden rejected criticism from Democrats worried he gave away too much. “They’ll find I didn’t,” he said. As for concern that the work requirements would hurt those in need of food, he said, “It’s a ridiculous assertion.”


Biden has been here before. As vice president, he was President Barack Obama’s chief negotiator in several fiscal showdowns, but he so aggravated fellow Democrats who thought he gave away too much that Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, then the party leader in the Senate, effectively barred Biden in 2013 from negotiations over a debt ceiling increase.


Kicking a vice president out of the room, of course, is one thing. Biden is now the president and the leader of his party heading into a reelection year. It’s his room. And he is managing it on his own terms, like it or not.

20 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page