Search
  • The San Juan Daily Star

Material recovered from Trump by archives included classified information


President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump are greeted by well-wishers as they depart the White House for a trip to Valdosta, Ga., on Dec. 5, 2020.

By Luke Broadwater and Michael S. Schmidt


The National Archives confirmed late last week that it had found classified information among material that President Donald Trump had taken with him to his home in Florida when he left office last year and that it had consulted with the Justice Department about the matter.


The agency “has identified items marked as classified national security information within the boxes,” according to a letter posted on the National Archives and Record Administration’s website.


Last month, the archives retrieved 15 boxes that Trump took with him to his Mar-a-Lago home from the White House residence when his term ended. The boxes included material subject to the Presidential Records Act, which requires that all documents and records pertaining to official business be turned over to the archives.


The items in the boxes included documents, mementos, gifts and letters. The archives did not describe the classified material it found other than to say that it was “classified national security information.”


Because the National Archives “identified classified information in the boxes,” the agency “has been in communication with the Department of Justice,” said the letter, written by David S. Ferriero, the national archivist, and sent to Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, D-N.Y., chair of the House Oversight Committee, who has been scrutinizing how Trump handled presidential records.


Trump made attacking Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of national security materials a centerpiece of his 2016 presidential campaign. The latest revelations about Trump’s own laxity with classified information and his haphazard adherence to federal record-keeping laws have drawn cries of hypocrisy from Democrats.


Asked how Republicans would square Trump’s criticism of Clinton with his own record, a spokesperson for the Republican National Committee, which at one point approved a resolution condemning Clinton for using a private email server while she was secretary of state, did not respond.


The New York Times reported last week that among the documents that were sent back to the National Archives were some that archivists believed were classified, and that the agency had consulted with the Justice Department about the discovery.


It is not clear what steps, if any, the Justice Department is taking to address the matter.


Ferriero’s letter came on the same day that a federal judge rejected Trump’s request to dismiss three civil suits seeking to hold him to account for his role in the attack on the Capitol last year. And it came a day after a judge in New York ruled that the former president had to answer questions from state investigators examining his company, the Trump Organization, for evidence of fraud.


In the past two weeks, a series of disclosures has raised new questions about the Trump administration’s failure to follow federal record-keeping laws and its handling of classified information as Trump left office.


Focusing attention on a new element of the issue, the National Archives said in its letter Friday that the Trump White House had failed to turn over records that included “certain social media records.”


The Trump White House, the archives said, failed to take “any steps to capture deleted content from any Trump Administration social media account other than @realDonaldTrump or @POTUS.” The accounts in question included those for aides such as Andrew Giuliani, Chad Gilmartin, Ivanka Trump, Kayleigh McEnany, Kellyanne Conway, Mark Meadows and Peter Navarro that the archives said contained presidential records.


The archives also has not been able to locate any of the Snapchat messages sent by the Trump White House.


Ferriero also wrote that “some White House staff conducted official business using nonofficial electronic messaging accounts that were not copied or forwarded into their official electronic messaging accounts.” The archives said it was in the process of obtaining some of those records.


Among those staff members was Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, who recently turned over hundreds of pages of documents to the committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, some of which came from his personal cellphone. The committee said it had questions about why Meadows had used a personal cellphone, a Signal account and two personal Gmail accounts to conduct official business, and whether he had properly turned over all of the relevant records from those accounts to the National Archives.


Ferriero made clear in his letter that the archives had been concerned for several years about Trump’s failure to follow the record-keeping law.


In June 2018, the archives “learned from an article in Politico that textual presidential records were being torn up by former President Trump and that White House staff were attempting to tape them back together,” the letter said.


The letter added, referring to the National Archives and Records Administration: “The White House Counsel’s Office indicated that they would address the matter. After the end of the Trump administration, NARA learned that additional paper records that had been torn up by former President Trump were included in the records transferred to us. Although White House staff during the Trump administration recovered and taped together some of the torn-up records, a number of other torn-up records that were transferred had not been reconstructed by the White House.”


In a statement Friday night, Trump said the material had been turned over to the archives as part of “an ordinary and routine process” and suggested that efforts by Democrats to raise questions about his handling of the documents were a scam. “The fake news is making it seem like me, as the president of the United States, was working in a filing room,” he said.


The confirmation by the archives that it had found classified information in the material could present the Justice Department with choices about how to proceed. It could open a criminal investigation into whether Trump and his aides mishandled classified information, as it did in Clinton’s case.


The department could also choose to treat the matter as more routine. Senior U.S. officials often mistakenly mishandle classified information, for example by taking it home from work or accidentally using it or discussing it on unsecured channels. In many of those instances, the FBI treats the matter like “a spill” that has to be cleaned up.


In those cases, FBI agents take a range of measures to ensure that any national security secrets that may have been exposed are collected so they can be stored on secure channels, and they scrub, or destroy, electronic devices where the information may have been housed or discussed.


Trump’s handling of government documents has come under growing scrutiny. A book scheduled to be released in October by a Times reporter revealed how staff members in the White House residence periodically discovered wads of printed paper clogging a toilet, leading them to believe that Trump had tried to flush them.


The former president’s use of cellphones to conduct official business also could have led to large gaps in the official White House logs of his calls on Jan. 6, 2021, hindering the House select committee’s investigation into the Capitol riot. If Trump did not preserve cellphone records and failed to turn them over to the National Archives, that could also be a violation of the law.

9 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All