top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe San Juan Daily Star

Merger of publishers could test Biden on antitrust enforcement

The lobby of Penguin Random House in Manhattan on July 27, 2022. The Biden administration is suing to block Penguin Random House from buying Simon & Schuster. A United States District Court will decide if the sale can proceed.

By David McCabe

A federal judge earlier this week began a trial that will decide whether Penguin Random House is allowed to buy Simon & Schuster, a case that could significantly affect the book publishing industry and that will test the Biden administration’s efforts to expand antitrust enforcement.

In opening statements in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, John Read, a lawyer for the Justice Department, said the merger “must be stopped.”

Read laid out the government’s case that the merger would reduce the number of bidders for the rights to publish what the government has called “anticipated top-selling books,” in turn driving down the value of advances paid to authors. “This lawsuit is designed to protect those authors and those books,” he said.

The $2.18 billion acquisition of Simon & Schuster would expand Penguin Random House, which is already the largest book publisher in the U.S., and eliminate one of the other “Big Five” book houses. The industry has already undergone a fair amount of consolidation, with Penguin Random House, owned by German company Bertelsmann, itself the product of a 2013 merger.

The case is also an early test of the Biden administration’s efforts to take on more boundary-pushing antitrust cases, in this instance, one arguing that corporate concentration is bad for workers, including book authors.

The companies have said that they believe that Simon & Schuster authors will benefit from Penguin Random House’s significant distribution resources and that more-efficient business operations will allow them to increase author pay. And a lawyer for Penguin Random House, Daniel Petrocelli, argued in his opening statement that the government’s case had a fundamental flaw: The idea that a discrete category of anticipated bestselling books exists in the industry is not grounded in reality, he said. Publishers, Petrocelli added, often pay big advances for books that fail to do well financially.

“Every book is a dream,” Petrocelli said. “And sometimes dreams come true, and sometimes they don’t.”

The trial is expected to bring a parade of publishing executives, literary agents and authors as witnesses to the wood-paneled courtroom of Judge Florence Y. Pan.

On Monday, Michael Pietsch, CEO of Hachette Book Group, another of the Big Five publishing houses, testified that he believed the merger would result in a “loss in variety” of books and lower advances for authors. Pietsch said he hoped Hachette’s parent company would pursue buying Simon & Schuster if the proposed merger fell apart.

Stephen King, the bestselling author of horror novels, is expected to testify for the government.

7 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Bull markets embolden retail traders to make risky bets

Retail traders are piling into risky bets after recouping all the losses made in the last two years as a rally in AI poster child Nvidia’s shares and bets on easing monetary policy pushed U.S. stocks


bottom of page