Search
  • The San Juan Daily Star

U.K.’s new leader lays out sweeping plan to cap energy prices


Prime Minister Liz Truss campaigned on a message of tax cuts and deregulation, which made the price freeze a striking ideological reversal.

By Mark Landler and Eshe Nelson


Scrambling to spare millions of households the pain of skyrocketing energy bills this winter, Britain’s new prime minister, Liz Truss, announced a sweeping plan Thursday to freeze gas and electricity rates for two years, at a cost of tens of billions of pounds to the British Treasury.


The plan, rolled out by Truss on her third day in office, could represent the largest government intervention in the economy in decades, even bigger than the emergency measures during the coronavirus pandemic, when the state spent 78 billion pounds (about $90 billion) to keep people in their jobs.


The move is intended to shield people from a jolting increase in energy costs next month, when the annual price for electricity and natural gas for a typical British household was scheduled to jump to 3,549 pounds, from 1,971 pounds. Under the plan, average annual costs would be capped at 2,500 pounds. Costs for businesses, charities and schools would also be capped for six months, underscoring the extraordinary reach of the program.


Truss announced that the government would lift a ban on hydraulic fracturing and grant approvals for new oil and gas drilling in the North Sea. That is part of a longer-term effort to make Britain less dependent on imported energy. But the new supplies will not flow quickly enough to avert the current crisis — mainly the fallout from Russia’s retaliatory cutbacks in gas supplies to Europe.


“This is a moment to be bold,” Truss said to a raucous House of Commons. “We are facing a global energy crisis, and there are no cost-free options.”


The measure, she said, would save a typical household 1,000 pounds a year, including a 400-pound reduction on bills that the last government announced in May.


“We’re supporting this country through this winter and the next,” she said.


For Truss, who campaigned on a message of tax cuts and deregulation, it was both a striking ideological reversal and a litmus test for her fledgling government. Whether the new plan will settle the nerves of people anxious about being able to heat and light their homes this winter could determine her fate as prime minister.


It could also help determine how successfully the West will weather Russia’s efforts to use energy as a weapon against European countries that imposed sanctions on Moscow after the invasion of Ukraine. Although Britain is far less reliant on Russian energy than Germany or Italy, the structure of its energy market makes it extremely sensitive to fluctuations in the price of natural gas.


In her remarks, Truss did not put a price tag on the policy, with officials saying that the cost would depend on several variables, including the market price of gas. But Britain’s plan will necessitate enormous borrowing, which could affect the government’s credit rating and the strength of its currency.


The pound has traded this week at its lowest levels against the dollar since 1985, when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister, reflecting alarm about soaring inflation, a looming recession and how the government will fund so much more spending and tax cuts.


Capping energy rates, however, should take some of the steam out of the inflation rate, which economists had projected could peak anywhere from 13% to 22% by early next year. Consumer prices rose more than 10% in July from a year ago, the fastest pace in four decades. Truss estimated that the price caps could curb the inflation rate by up to 5 percentage points.


Truss has said that she will go ahead with a campaign promise to cut taxes, claiming that it will help lift the economy overall. But some critics said that such a move would only worsen the damage to Britain’s public finances and could exacerbate inflation by stoking more demand in the economy. Truss has insisted that the government could recoup some of its lost revenue through faster economic growth.

4 views0 comments