top of page

Anthropic’s restraint is a terrifying warning sign.

Writer: The San Juan Daily Star
The San Juan Daily Star
Apr 10
5 min read
An employee enters the Anthropic office in San Francisco, June 7, 2023. A panel of federal judges on Wednesday, April 8, 2026, denied a motion from Anthropic to stop the Department of Defense from labeling it a security risk, a setback for the artificial intelligence company in its battle with the Trump administration over how AI should be used in warfare. (Marissa Leshnov/The New York Times)
An employee enters the Anthropic office in San Francisco, June 7, 2023. A panel of federal judges on Wednesday, April 8, 2026, denied a motion from Anthropic to stop the Department of Defense from labeling it a security risk, a setback for the artificial intelligence company in its battle with the Trump administration over how AI should be used in warfare. (Marissa Leshnov/The New York Times)

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN


Normally right now I would be writing about the geopolitical implications of the war with Iran, and I am sure I will again soon. But I want to interrupt that thought to highlight a stunning advance in artificial intelligence — one that arrived sooner than expected and that will have equally profound geopolitical implications.


The AI company Anthropic announced Tuesday that it was releasing the newest generation of its large language model, dubbed Claude Mythos Preview, but to only a limited consortium of roughly 40 technology companies, including Google, Broadcom, Nvidia, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, Apple, JPMorganChase, Amazon and Microsoft. Some of its competitors are among these partners because this new AI model represents a “step change” in performance that has some critically important positive and negative implications for cybersecurity and America’s national security.


The good news is that Anthropic discovered in the process of developing Claude Mythos that the AI could not only write software code more easily and with greater complexity than any model currently available, but as a byproduct of that capability, it could also find vulnerabilities in virtually all of the world’s most popular software systems more easily than before.


The bad news is that if this tool falls into the hands of bad actors, they could hack pretty much every major software system in the world, including all those made by the companies in the consortium.


This is not a publicity stunt. In the run-up to this announcement, representatives of leading tech companies have been in private conversation with the Trump administration about the implications for the security of the United States and all the other countries that use these now vulnerable software systems, technologists involved told me.


For good reason. As Anthropic said in its written statement on Tuesday, in just the past month, “Mythos Preview has already found thousands of high-severity vulnerabilities, including some in every major operating system and web browser. Given the rate of AI progress, it will not be long before such capabilities proliferate, potentially beyond actors who committed to deploying them safely. The fallout — economics, public safety and national security — could be severe.’’


Project Glasswing, Anthropic’s name for the consortium, is an undertaking to work with the biggest and most trusted tech companies and critical infrastructure providers, including banks, “to put these capabilities to work for defensive purposes,” the company added, and to give the leading technology firms a head start in finding and patching those vulnerabilities.


“We do not plan to make Claude Mythos Preview generally available, but our eventual goal is to enable our users to safely deploy Mythos-class models at scale — for cybersecurity purposes, but also for the myriad other benefits that such highly capable models will bring,” Anthropic said.


My translation: Holy cow! Superintelligent AI is arriving faster than anticipated, at least in this area. We knew it was getting amazingly good at enabling anyone, no matter how computer literate, to write software code. But even Anthropic reportedly did not anticipate that it would get this good, this fast, at finding ways to find and exploit flaws in existing code.


Anthropic said it found critical exposures in every major operating system and Web browser, many of which run power grids, waterworks, airline reservation systems, retailing networks, military systems and hospitals all over the world.


If this AI tool were, indeed, to become widely available, it would mean the ability to hack any major infrastructure system — a hard and expensive effort that was once essentially the province only of private-sector experts and intelligence organizations — will be available to every criminal actor, terrorist organization and country, no matter how small.


I’m really not being hyperbolic when I say that kids could deploy this by accident. Mom and Dad, get ready for:


“Honey, what did you do after school today?”


“Well, Mom, my friends and I took down the power grid. What’s for dinner?”


That is why Anthropic is giving carefully controlled versions to key software providers so they can find and fix the vulnerabilities before the bad guys do — or your kids.


At moments like this I prefer to do a deep dive with my technology tutor, Craig Mundie, a former director of research and strategy at Microsoft, a member of President Barack Obama’s President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and an author, with Henry Kissinger and Eric Schmidt, of a book on AI called “Genesis.”


In our view, no country in the world can solve this problem alone. The solution — this may shock people — must begin with the two AI superpowers, the U.S. and China. It is now urgent that they learn to collaborate to prevent bad actors from gaining access to this next level of cyber capability.


Such a powerful tool would threaten them both, leaving them exposed to criminal actors inside their countries and terrorist groups and other adversaries outside. It could easily become a greater threat to each country than the two countries are to each other.


Indeed, this is potentially as fundamental and significant a turning point as was the emergence of mutually assured destruction and the need for nuclear nonproliferation. The U.S. and China need to work together to protect themselves, as well the rest of the world, from humans and autonomous AIs using this technology — a lot more than they need to worry about Russia.


This is so important and urgent that it should be a top subject on the agenda for the summit between Trump and President Xi Jinping in Beijing next month.


“What used to be the province of big countries, big militaries, big companies and big criminal organizations with big budgets — this ability to develop sophisticated cyberhacking operations — could become easily available to small actors,” explained Mundie. “What we are about to see is nothing short of the complete democratization of cyberattack capabilities.”


It means that responsible governments, in concert with the companies that build these AI tools and software infrastructure, need to do three things urgently, Mundie argues.


For starters, he says, we need to “carefully control the release of these new superintelligent models and make sure they only go to the most responsible governments and companies.”


Then we need to use the time this buys us to distribute defensive tools to the good actors “so that the software that runs their key infrastructure can have all their flaws found and fixed before hackers inevitably get these tools one way or another.” (By the way, the cost of fixing the vulnerabilities that are sure to be discovered in legacy software systems, like those of telephone companies, will be significant. Then multiply that across our whole industrial base.)

39 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
timmothybu.r.ns83.57.8
Sep 11

Đang nói vụ giao diện dễ dùng thì mình nhớ ngay tới vipwin, tối qua mình tranh thủ vài phút lúc nghỉ tay lướt thử trên điện thoại cho biết thôi. Mình không vào sâu hay đọc kỹ nội dung, chủ yếu nhìn cách họ bày trang và cảm nhận độ “dễ nhìn” khi kéo xuống, thấy mọi thứ nằm theo từng khối rõ ràng nên mắt bắt thông tin khá nhanh, không phải căng ra đoán cái nào là cái nào. Có mấy chỗ dạng bảng theo cột nhìn gọn, chữ và khoảng cách vừa phải nên liếc phát hiểu ngay. Menu để ở vị trí dễ thấy nên đổi qua lại vài mục cũng lẹ. Nói chung ấn…

Like

myla.phan236.9
Sep 10

SC88 mình thấy mấy hôm nay bị nhắc nhiều quá nên cũng ghé thử cho biết thôi. Không phải kiểu vào để soi kèo hay gì, mình chủ yếu xem trang nhìn ra sao với đọc lướt nội dung. Ấn tượng đầu là load khá nhanh, bấm qua lại mấy mục không bị đứng hay giật nên cảm giác dùng ổn. Trên trang có đoạn “tổng quan” giới thiệu thương hiệu với kiểu nhấn mạnh dịch vụ 5 sao, đặt khá dễ thấy nên người mới vào cũng hiểu họ đang nói về cái gì. Mình thích cách họ chia nội dung thành từng khối, tiêu đề to rõ ràng nên lướt một vòng là nắm được bố cục, nhất…

Like

nolafo.wle156+abc123
Sep 10

QS88 lúc đầu mình cũng hơi nghi nghi kiểu “lại thêm một trang nhìn cho vui thôi”, nên vào xem thử cho biết chứ không kỳ vọng gì nhiều. Lướt một vòng thì thấy họ trình bày theo từng khối nội dung rõ ràng, nên mắt không phải đảo liên tục để tìm chỗ cần đọc, nhìn phát biết đâu là phần giới thiệu thương hiệu và đâu là khu chính để vào xem. Mình để ý phần thông tin họ ghi là ra mắt từ 2018 ở Luân Đôn, đọc nhanh cũng đủ nắm bối cảnh (không phải mò mẫm lịch sử dài dòng). Menu đặt ngay chỗ dễ thấy nên chuyển mục qua lại cũng đỡ bực, nhất…

Like

robert50powell.9.5.8.4+abc123
Sep 09

fun79 có dễ dùng như lời đồn không? mình hơi nghi ngờ chút mà vào thử thì thấy cũng ổn thật. Giao diện nhìn hiện đại, màu sắc vừa phải nên không bị chói mắt, bấm vài cái là quen tay. Menu để rõ ràng ngay trên đầu trang, chuyển qua lại giữa các mục không bị lạc, kiểu đi đường thẳng chứ không phải vòng vòng tìm cửa. Mình thích nhất là cách họ chia nội dung thành từng khối riêng, tiêu đề nổi nên kéo xuống đọc nhanh vẫn nắm được ý. Thêm cái nữa là thao tác cuộn và load trang khá mượt, không kiểu giật giật làm tụt hứng. Nói chung mình không kỳ vọng nhiều,…

Like

nolafo.wle156+abc123
Sep 06

QQ88 tối qua mình có vào thử đúng vài phút lúc rảnh, mục đích chỉ là xem bố cục có dễ nắm không; kéo xuống một cái là thấy mọi thứ chia thành các khối rõ ràng, nhìn phát biết đoạn nào là thông tin chính, đoạn nào là phần hiển thị dữ liệu nên không bị rối mắt; chữ cỡ vừa, khoảng cách dòng ổn nên đọc lướt vẫn theo kịp. Mình cũng để ý cái menu nằm chỗ dễ nhìn, bấm qua lại giữa các mục không phải tìm lâu, chuyển trang cũng mượt nên đỡ mất thời gian làm quen; kiểu này hợp với người chỉ muốn vào xem nhanh rồi thoát. Nói chung mình thích nhất…

Like
bottom of page