Even as they praise Iran ceasefire, world leaders are whipsawed by Trump.
- The San Juan Daily Star
- 9 hours ago
- 5 min read
By JIM TANKERSLEY
World leaders expressed relief Wednesday that the United States, Israel and Iran had agreed to a temporary ceasefire, with President Donald Trump backing off his apocalyptic threat to escalate a war that had already set off a cascading series of global crises.
But the relief was tempered by the profound powerlessness that most countries have felt over the last six weeks as they watched Trump wage a war that has rattled their economies, their energy supplies, their domestic politics and their relationships with the world’s preeminent superpower.
World leaders have been swept up in Trump’s personal and geopolitical gyrations since the war began in late February. They have been left guessing whether he would lob new strikes at Iran or call an end to hostilities — both of which he has signaled at various times. They have endured long rants about the United States receiving insufficient help and gratitude from allies, laced with threats about quitting NATO, all while suffering oil and gas price shocks and supply shortages caused by the war.
Officials in some of those countries noted the hurdles that remain for the two-week ceasefire to become permanent, including addressing the thorny issues of Iran’s nuclear ambitions and securing the Strait of Hormuz for global shipping. They acknowledged how difficult, and time-consuming, it would be to repair the cracks this war has opened in the global economy and security environment.
And they were left searching for better ways to navigate the new world order that Trump has brought to bear in his second term in the White House, in which the president whipsaws friends and foes alike, with little ability to buffer the shocks.
“Is the world a better place today than yesterday? Undoubtedly,” the Danish foreign minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, wrote on the social platform X. “Than 40 days ago? More than doubtful.”
Pedro Sánchez, the prime minister of Spain, an outspoken opponent of the Iran war, said ceasefires were “always good news,” especially, he added, “if they lead to a just and durable peace.” But he also delivered a harsh condemnation of Trump’s military campaign.
“The momentary relief cannot make us forget the chaos, the destruction, and the lives lost,” he wrote on social media. “The government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket. What is needed now: diplomacy, international law and PEACE.”
Perhaps surprisingly, Sánchez joined a half-dozen other European leaders, along with leaders from Canada, the European Commission and the European Council, in committing Wednesday to provide government support “to ensuring freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.”
Such an effort remains conceptual for now, despite Trump’s insistence that his NATO allies send military assets to help relieve the Iranian blockade of the waterway, with the goal of bringing global oil and gas prices back down from elevated levels.
Beyond Europe, the ceasefire also drew praise from countries including Oman, Japan, Malaysia and Australia, sometimes accompanied by criticism of Trump and the effects of the war on their economies — or discussions of the tough diplomatic road ahead.
“While this is encouraging news, there remains significant important work to be done in the coming days to secure a lasting ceasefire,” Winston Peters, the foreign minister of New Zealand, said in a statement. The war, he said, “has had wide-ranging impacts and disruptions — for both those in the Middle East and further afield.”
Other leaders nodded heavily to the war’s ongoing disruptions of global energy supplies, which have pushed many governments to take costly measures to soften the burden on drivers and other consumers.
“The goal now must be to negotiate a lasting end to the war in the coming days,” German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in a statement Wednesday, which also pledged German help in an international effort to reopen the strait. Those negotiations, he added, “can avert a severe global energy crisis.”
To their frustration, leaders appear to have little ability to influence Trump, in this war or any other conflict. The difficulty of parsing Trump’s bellicose and often shifting pronouncements has been a monthlong challenge. Other leaders have adopted a variety of responses, including mild support, measured pushback and sometimes just public silence, hoping Trump will change his mind on his own.
Take Tuesday, for instance, when Trump made the apocalyptic threat to Iran, saying the U.S. would wipe out its civilization. Neither Merz nor British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded publicly to the statement, nor did French President Emmanuel Macron.
That appeared to be a deliberate silence, avoiding any possible provocation of the U.S. president, while diplomats — led by the Pakistani government — worked behind the scenes to secure the ceasefire. Instead, Macron and Merz posted unrelated comments on X.
Other officials across Europe have tried for the last month to blunt the economic and political impacts of the spiking price of oil and gas, driven by the war.
In Italy, the president of a teachers union has warned that students might have to return to remote learning in the final weeks of school if fuel shortages continue and made it difficult to keep buildings open. The crisis has hit Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni at a vulnerable time politically, after she lost a referendum to overhaul the Italian judiciary.
Meloni’s Cabinet has cut fuel taxes through at least the end of May to provide some relief for consumers. Spain has similarly cut energy taxes. German officials have limited gas stations to only one price increase per day, and they are debating further measures to help consumers. The European Trade Union Confederation estimated Wednesday that a prolonged crisis could raise energy costs by nearly 2,000 euros (around $2,300) this year for a typical European Union household.
Experts warn more help could be needed, even with the progress in negotiations.
“What has been done so far has created deep damages to the energy infrastructure,” said Tito Boeri, a professor of economics at Bocconi University in Milan. “So even if the Hormuz Strait is reopened it will take time before these countries go back to full capacity.”
Starmer was set to travel to the Persian Gulf on Wednesday to meet with allies and discuss how to keep the strait permanently open to international shipping, government officials said. His trip was planned before the ceasefire was announced. It follows discussions on the strait hosted by Britain over the last week among diplomats and military planners from more than 40 countries.
As of Wednesday, those talks had yet to produce a full plan of action.
Comments