Rodríguez Veve wants governor to repeal ban on sex conversion therapies for minors.
- The San Juan Daily Star
- 6 days ago
- 1 min read
By THE STAR STAFF
Independent Sen. Joanne Rodríguez Veve announced Monday night that she has formally requested that Gov. Jenniffer González Colón repeal an executive order banning so-called conversion therapies for minors.
The executive order, OE-2019-016, was signed in 2019 by former Gov. Ricardo Rosselló Nevares and prohibits the practice of conversion therapies on individuals under the age of 18.
In a statement posted on social media, Rodríguez Veve argued that the ban is unconstitutional in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
“According to the recent decision of the federal Supreme Court in Chiles v. Salazar, such prohibitions, in the context of talk therapy, are unconstitutional because they violate the fundamental right to freedom of speech,” the legislator stated.
Conversion therapies refer to practices that attempt to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity, typically seeking to make individuals stop identifying as homosexual, bisexual or transgender. The practices are commonly carried out through psychological counseling or religious guidance and have been widely criticized by medical and human rights organizations.
According to ILGA World, at least 20 U.S. states have enacted legislation banning conversion therapies. The ILGA (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association) is an LGBTQ+ rights organization founded in 1978 and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland.
I’ve noticed that websites with well-structured information are much easier to use. Many platforms organize data into short summaries and clear sections, making key features and details easy to find. While exploring laser247 login, I appreciated how intuitively everything was arranged, allowing me to navigate quickly between sections. It’s a great way to get a general overview without feeling overwhelmed, and it’s especially helpful for beginners who want to explore different options efficiently.
It feels like a mix of both, and that’s why it’s so complicated. On one hand, there’s a real concern about protecting young people from practices that many medical organizations consider harmful. On the other, some argue that restricting certain types of talk or counseling raises constitutional questions around free speech.
Personally, I think the key is how these “therapies” are defined and practiced—there’s a big difference between open-ended conversations and approaches aimed at changing someone’s identity. That nuance often gets lost in political discussions.
If anyone’s looking to better understand how similar debates are framed in different contexts, I came across a resource that breaks down complex topics in a pretty structured way: https://jtwin-bd.com/
Curious to hear how others…