top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureThe San Juan Daily Star

Caitlin Clark is here. Can the business of the WNBA flourish?



Full stands to see Caitlin Clark and the Iowa Hawkeyes host Wisconsin, in Iowa City on Jan. 16, 2024. The business of women’s basketball is booming. And the start of the 2024 WNBA season has many wondering if the sport is entering a new economic era. But there are still obstacles the league needs to overcome. (Hilary Swift/The New York Times)

By Jacob Meschke and Santul Nerkar


The business of women’s basketball is booming. And the start of the 2024 WNBA season has many wondering if the sport is entering a new economic era.


The arrival of stars including Caitlin Clark, the former University of Iowa phenom who is now a rookie with the Indiana Fever, has boosted interest and ticket sales. All the league’s teams will fly charter for the first time this season, team sponsorships are growing, and marquee players are racking up endorsement deals. A new TV deal could fill its coffers and further elevate the league’s profile.


But there are still obstacles the league needs to overcome before attaining the kind of stature that other professional sports leagues have. The average WNBA salary is around $120,000, much lower than the NBA’s, and the relatively low pay has traditionally prompted even the highest-earning players to play overseas during the league’s offseason to make extra money. The league has long had stars, but it has struggled to market their skills and personalities to a mass audience.


How the WNBA capitalizes on the current moment — and approaches its more prominent place in the media landscape — could have a significant effect on the league’s future.


A chance to capitalize.


More than 18 million people, a record, watched the University of South Carolina beat Clark and Iowa in the women’s NCAA Tournament final this year, up from the roughly 10 million who watched the title game in 2023, which was also a record. This year, for the first time, more people watched the women’s final than the men’s.


Clark has had a unique effect. In her four years at Iowa, she broke the Division I scoring record for men and women and led the Hawkeyes to consecutive national title games. She also helped sell out arenas and boost TV ratings, and has become one of the most visible stars in all of college sports. According to a March poll conducted by Seton Hall University’s School of Business, Clark was the most well-known college basketball player in the country, with 44% of Americans saying they had heard of her.


Supporters of the WNBA are hoping that growth in the college game translates to the pros. Last year’s finals averaged 728,000 viewers per game, the highest in 20 years.


Players say they can sense a difference. Sue Bird, the former Seattle Storm and University of Connecticut star, said in an interview that compared with 2002, when she entered the league, the WNBA is taken more seriously by fans. The common sentiment back then, Bird said, was that “you were taking a step down” coming from playing college basketball.


“They were accustomed to a certain standard in college, and they’re now seeing it in the WNBA,” Bird said.


And so far, the interest in Clark seems to have carried over to the league. A record 2.5 million people watched the WNBA draft April 15, when Clark was selected No. 1 overall. Three of the Fever’s first four games are being nationally televised, on ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC, and the other was on Amazon Prime. As a testament to the league’s growing popularity, the Bay Area will get a WNBA team in 2025, and another team is reportedly planned in Toronto.


WNBA players — even stars — don’t make a lot.


When the Indiana Fever picked Clark in the draft, many — including President Joe Biden — were shocked to learn her starting salary: $76,535.


Clark’s college endorsements — valued at more than $3 million, according to On3, a site that tracks name, image and likeness, or NIL, deals for college athletes — and ones she has signed with since getting to Indiana make her base salary a small portion of her overall compensation.


Base salaries in the WNBA range from about $64,000 for rookies drafted in the third round to about $240,000 for veterans. Out of roughly 144 players in the league, 22 make more than $200,000 annually, and 78 make less than $100,000, according to Spotrac, a site that tracks players’ contracts.


Players can earn more, with bonuses for those who win individual awards and whose teams are successful. The league pays a small, rotating cohort of players a total of $1 million each season to participate in leaguewide marketing partnerships.


Today, about half of WNBA teams share ownership with an NBA team, and in some cases facilities and front offices. That includes the Fever, who share ownership and facilities with the Indiana Pacers. Ownership of the WNBA itself is still split between the collective 30 NBA teams and 12 WNBA teams. In 2022, the WNBA announced $75 million of new investments from more than two dozen investors, including NBA and WNBA team owners.


New deals could change things.


The leagues remain worlds apart when it comes to revenue. But proponents of higher pay for WNBA players point out that they make a lower share of league revenue than NBA players do, 10% compared with about 50%.


Negotiations for media rights, a key driver of the revenues of sports leagues, are underway for the NBA and WNBA. The two leagues have generally negotiated rights deals together.


The current deal expires at the end of the 2024-25 NBA season. At that point, the WNBA could choose, for the first time, to separate its agreement from the NBA.


The league must prioritize continuing to expand its fan base and market its stars, as the NBA did with Larry Bird and Magic Johnson in the 1980s, said Len Elmore, a former NBA player and a senior lecturer at Columbia University’s Sports Management Program.


“Television rights are what’s catapulted NBA salaries,” Elmore said. “It comes down to having those players, and it comes down to TV.”


The current collective bargaining agreement between the WNBA and the union that represents the players governs players’ compensation. Chiney Ogwumike, a forward for the Los Angeles Sparks, said the recent growth of the WNBA was buttressing the players’ case that they should receive a greater share of league revenue.


“The numbers are supporting players finally being rewarded as drivers of revenue,” she said in an interview.


Endorsements are a wild card.


As the profile of the college game has risen, stars have earned millions through endorsements. For instance, Angel Reese, now in her rookie season with the Chicago Sky, had NIL deals worth a reported $1.8 million while at Louisiana State University.


But more endorsement deals are happening with WNBA players. Clark is reportedly signing a $20 million deal with Nike. The company is also making a signature shoe with A’ja Wilson, the Las Vegas Aces star.


Sue Bird said she was optimistic that the current crop of rookies, combined with the league’s existing stars, would draw more attention — and sponsorships — to the WNBA.


The current stars, Bird said, “have a certain value both in their play and their marketability, and that will just grow the pot and the pie for everybody else.”



NBA PLAYOFFS

Conference Finals

Today’s Eastern Conference Game 1

Indiana Pacers at Boston Celtics, 8 p.m. ET

(ESPN, ESPN Deportes)


Wednesday’s Western Conference Game 1

Dallas Mavericks at Minnesota Timberwolves,

8:30 p.m. ET (TNT)

75 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page