top of page

With a snub on a cricket field, India-Pakistan tensions hit new pitch

  • Writer: The San Juan Daily Star
    The San Juan Daily Star
  • Sep 19
  • 3 min read
India and Pakistan faced off in the United Arab Emirates in a group stage game of the Asia Cup tournament last Sunday. India won the match, then politics ensued. (Reddit via r/IndiaCricket)
India and Pakistan faced off in the United Arab Emirates in a group stage game of the Asia Cup tournament last Sunday. India won the match, then politics ensued. (Reddit via r/IndiaCricket)

By SALMAN MASOOD and PRAGATI K.B.


It is one of the fiercest rivalries in sports. It cranks up nationalistic fervor in two nuclear-armed neighbors. It draws viewership across the world, given the vast diasporas of the two competitors: India and Pakistan.


And yet somehow the game of cricket has, at times, offered a fragile semblance of civility even during the most strained moments between the two countries. Tensions away from the sport, it was said and hoped, could be cooled on the field with a simple handshake between the two teams.


But none of that was in evidence last Sunday night.


India and Pakistan were facing off in the United Arab Emirates in a group stage game of the Asia Cup tournament. Batting second, India cruised to victory. Then, with barely a glance backward, the Indian players walked off the field. No handshakes. No exchange of pleasantries.


“We were ready to shake hands,” said Pakistan’s coach, Mike Hesson, a New Zealander. “But they had already gone in.”


In a postmatch news conference, Suryakumar Yadav, the Indian captain and the player who scored the winning runs, said that the snub had been planned.


He dedicated the win to India’s armed forces and to the victims of a massacre in which 26 people were killed on the Indian side of Kashmir in April that his country’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, described as a “terror attack.” India accused Pakistan of being involved in the assault, a claim that Pakistan denied. The episode led to some of the worst fighting in decades between the two countries before a ceasefire was declared.


Going into the cricket match, the first since the conflict, India’s government and its cricket establishment were “aligned,” Yadav said, appearing to acknowledge a new level of nationalistic fervor being attached to the game in India. He added, “We gave the proper reply.”


Sharda Ugra, a sports journalist in India, said that there was a more forceful way for India to have lodged a protest against Pakistan. The team could have forfeited Sunday’s game.


“It would mean 2 points less, which would in turn mean they had to fight harder” to advance in the tournament, she said. “That would have made a bigger statement because it would show this is what you’re willing to put on the line.”


On the Pakistani side, the reaction to the snub was sharp and angry.


Salman Agha, the captain of the Pakistani team, skipped the postmatch ceremony, and the team filed a complaint with the match referee.


The chair of the Pakistan Cricket Board, Mohsin Naqvi, who also leads the Asian Cricket Council, issued a terse public statement, saying: “Utterly disappointing to witness the lack of sportsmanship today. Dragging politics into the game goes against the very spirit of sports.”


But in India, many celebrated the move, and there was little criticism of Yadav and his team. Online, some users called the gesture long overdue.


In a way, it was the heavyweight of the sport throwing its weight around. India is the economic engine of cricket and is home to one of the richest leagues in all of sports, the Indian Premier League. India’s cricket authorities also have links to the government — Jay Shah, chair of the sport’s worldwide governing body, the International Cricket Council, is the son of Amit Shah, a powerful lieutenant of Modi.


Ammar Ali Jan, a historian in the Pakistani city of Lahore, said that members of the Indian cricket team’s decision not to acknowledge their opponents at the end of the game was another sign of the influence of Modi and Hindu nationalism.


“It is now shaping every sphere India participates in, including international sport,” he said. “It’s damaging the spirit of sportsmanship. It’s damaging cricket itself.”

2 Comments


Van Vidle
Van Vidle
Oct 15

Narratives can overwhelm cricket models; I keep focus on pitch, weather, and bowling matchups, then price totals and player milestones. If the market surges on headlines, I wait for drift back to my number. When entries line up, I execute on the 1xBet Kuwait official site, where alternates sit next to the main price and the slip preview confirms risk, helping me stick to the plan instead of chasing momentum. Keeping a written rationale and unit size beside each ticket makes post‑match review straightforward and keeps momentum from dictating decisions.

Like

margo zalizo
margo zalizo
Sep 26

Rivalries in sport often mirror deeper political and cultural divides, and no contest embodies this more than an India-Pakistan cricket match. A simple snub or gesture on the pitch can spark heated debates, showing how emotions spill beyond the boundary ropes. For fans, the drama extends beyond the scorecard, mixing passion with national pride. In recent years, some supporters have even turned to online platforms for added thrills, exploring games like plinko for real money that combine chance and excitement, much like the unpredictable nature of cricket itself.

Like

Looking for more information?
Get in touch with us today.

Postal Address:

PO Box 6537 Caguas, PR 00726

Phone:

Phone:

logo

© 2025 The San Juan Daily Star - Puerto Rico

Privacy Policies

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
bottom of page